Innocent Until Proven Guilty

         After Tiresias and Oedipus’ argument, the Chorus preforms a stasimon commenting on the discussion. Similar to the audience they wonder, “Who is the man the voice of god denounces” (527)? The accusations made against Oedipus are confusing because the Chorus cannot understand how Oedipus could be the killer. This reveals Chorus a tone of confliction among the Chorus. They want to believe the prophet, however simultaneously the Chorus has faith in their king. “I can’t accept him, can’t deny him, don’t know what to say, I’m lost” (552-553). However the Chorus remains loyal to Oedipus even if they “know of nothing, not in the past and not now” (556).   

            The Chorus states there is no evidence or “no certain proof” (565) which reveal Oedipus as the killer, therefore they cannot believe the accusations. Their logic is similar to the modern day justice system. To convict someone the prosecutor needs concrete evidence that cannot be overlooked. Even though a prophet, Tiresias only has his words. There is no proof or eyewitness present to support his accusations. As the “jury”, the Chorus only knows of his brilliance and skills from when he defeated the Sphinx. Saving the city years ago, the Chorus can only conclude Oedipus is a great, confident, and smart man. They do not know of anything else because no one revealed it to them. The Chorus explains, “not till I see these charges proved will I side with his accusers” (567-568). This quote reflects another modern saying- everyone is innocent until proven guilty.  The picture below displays the modern saying. It is a judge contemplating on the justice system. Individuals often assume people are guilty, before looking at all the facts.